{"id":21,"date":"2021-06-29T16:06:46","date_gmt":"2021-06-29T16:06:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.env.nm.gov\/petroleum_storage_tank\/cleanup-technologies\/"},"modified":"2025-02-03T16:26:47","modified_gmt":"2025-02-03T16:26:47","slug":"cleanup-technologies","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.env.nm.gov\/petroleum_storage_tank\/cleanup-technologies\/","title":{"rendered":"Cleanup Technologies"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div style=\"height:24px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:13px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>Between&nbsp;1988 and 2017,&nbsp;538,193 confirmed&nbsp;underground storage tank leaks&nbsp;were&nbsp;reported to the EPA, including those reported to states. It is important that cost-effective cleanup solutions be chosen, and that the technology be appropriate for the site and spill conditions. The list below includes&nbsp;alternatives to pump-and-treat remediation, which can be expensive yet ineffective in many geologic settings. For more in-depth information on cleanup technologies, see the EPA\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/clu-in.org\/remediation\/\">Remediation Technologies page<\/a> on their Contaminated Site Clean-Up website.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-left\">Some examples of remediation technologies are listed below. The ones with links go to EPA\u2019s remediation technology page on that topic:&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/clu-in.org\/techfocus\/default.focus\/sec\/Soil_Vapor_Extraction\/cat\/Overview\/\">Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE)<\/a> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/clu-in.org\/techfocus\/default.focus\/sec\/Bioremediation\/cat\/Overview\/\">Bioremediation<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Landfarming<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/clu-in.org\/techfocus\/default.focus\/sec\/Bioreactor%5FLandfills\/cat\/Overview\/\">Bioslurry\/Bioreactor Systems<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/clu-in.org\/techfocus\/default.focus\/sec\/Thermal%5FTreatment%3A%5FIn%5FSitu\/cat\/Overview\/\">Thermal Treatment: In-Situ<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/clu-in.org\/techfocus\/default.focus\/sec\/Thermal%5FTreatment%3A%5FEx%5FSitu\/cat\/Overview\/\">Thermal Treatment: Ex-Situ<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/clu-in.org\/techfocus\/default.focus\/sec\/Air%5FSparging\/cat\/Overview\/\">Air Sparging<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Biosparging<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/clu-in.org\/techfocus\/default.focus\/sec\/Natural%5FAttenuation\/cat\/Overview\/\">Natural Attenuation<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>In-Situ Groundwater Bioremediation<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/clu-in.org\/techfocus\/default.focus\/sec\/Multi%2DPhase%5FExtraction\/cat\/Overview\/\">Multi-Phase Extraction<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/clu-in.org\/techfocus\/default.focus\/sec\/Soil%5FWashing\/cat\/Overview\/\">Soil Washing<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/clu-in.org\/techfocus\/default.focus\/sec\/In%5FSitu%5FOxidation\/cat\/Overview\/\">In-Situ&nbsp;Oxidation<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:20px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center\"><span style=\"color: #008000\"><strong>Science&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;|&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Innovation&nbsp; &nbsp; |&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Collaboration&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Compliance<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Between&nbsp;1988 and 2017,&nbsp;538,193 confirmed&nbsp;underground storage tank leaks&nbsp;were&nbsp;reported to the EPA, including those reported to states. It is important that cost-effective cleanup solutions be chosen, and that the technology be appropriate for the site and spill conditions. The list below includes&nbsp;alternatives to pump-and-treat remediation, which can be expensive yet ineffective in many geologic settings. For more [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-21","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.env.nm.gov\/petroleum_storage_tank\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/21","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.env.nm.gov\/petroleum_storage_tank\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.env.nm.gov\/petroleum_storage_tank\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.env.nm.gov\/petroleum_storage_tank\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.env.nm.gov\/petroleum_storage_tank\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.env.nm.gov\/petroleum_storage_tank\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/21\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":349,"href":"https:\/\/www.env.nm.gov\/petroleum_storage_tank\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/21\/revisions\/349"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.env.nm.gov\/petroleum_storage_tank\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}