Asunto WQCC 12-01(R)

En el asunto de: PROPUESTA DE ENMIENDA A 20.6.2 NMAC - WQCC 12-01 (R)la Regla del Cobre.

PETICIÓN DE ADOPCIÓN DE 20.6.7 Y 20.6.8 NMAC Y SOLICITUD DE AUDIENCIA

RESPONDEDORES:

Andrew Knight y Kathryn Becker - Departamento de Medio Ambiente de Nuevo México / Oficina del Consejero General;
Dal Moellenberg y TJ Trujillo - Gallagher & Kennedy;
Bruce Fredrick y Jonathan Block - Centro de Derecho Ambiental de Nuevo México;
Tannis L. Fox - Oficina del Fiscal General de Nuevo México;
William Olson;
Louis W. Rose - Montgomery y Andrews, P.A.;
Tracy Hughes - High Desert Energy + Environment Law LLC; y
John Indall - Comeau, Maldegen, Templemen e Indall LLP.

La Comisión adoptó la propuesta de reglamentación final de NMED y la Exposición de Motivos el 25 de septiembre de 2013. Su Orden y Exposición de Motivos está disponible en línea en tres partes:

* WQCC 12-01 (R), the Copper Rule. The Administrator’s Pleading Log is available online. The referenced documents are below. 1.Motion to Approve Schedule for Development of Copper Regulations 2.Notice of Docketing 3.Order Approving Revised Schedule for Development of Copper Regulations 4.Petition to Adopt 20.6.7 and 20.6.8 NMAC and Request for Hearing 5.AG’s Motion to Admit Record from Tyrone Permit Appeal into Record Proper 6.Freeport-McMoRan’s Response to Petition for Rulemaking 7.Entry of Appearance by Dalva Moellenberg and T.J. Trujillo, Gallagher & Kennedy, for FMI 8.Gila Resources Information Project, Amigos Bravos and Turner Ranch Properties’ Response to Petition 9.NMED’s Response to AG’s Motion to Admit Record from Tyrone Permit Appeal10.Procedural Order11.Reply in Support of AG’s Motion to Admit Record from Tyrone Permit Appeal12.Freeport-McMoRan’s Objections to Procedural Order and Request for Clarification13.GRIP, Amigos Bravos and Turner Ranch Properties’ Joint Motion to Dismiss Petition for Rulemaking14.Entry of Appearance by Louis Rose of Montgomery & Andrews and Jon Indall of Comeau, Maldegen, Templeman & Indall for the New Mexico Mining Association15.NMED’s Brief on the Commission’s Authority to Consider the Petition16.AG’s Motion to Remand the Proposed Copper Mine Rule to NMED Attachment A, Attachment B, Attachment C, Attachment D, Attachment E, Attachment F, Attachment G Attachment H, Attachment I, Attachment J, Attachment K17.Freeport-McMoRan’s Brief on the Commission’s Authority to Conduct a Copper Industry-Specific Rulemaking18.AG’s Response to FMI’s Objections to Procedural Order and Request for Clarification19.FMI’s Consolidated Response to Joint Motion to Dismiss Petition and the AG’s Motion to Remand Proposed Rule20.AG’s Response to FMI’s Brief on the Commission’s Authority to Consider Petition21.AG’s Response to NMED’s Brief on Commission’s Authority to Consider Petition22.NM Mining Assoc. Consol. Memorandum in Response to AG’s Motion to Remand Proposed Rules and Various Organizations’ Joint Motion to Dismiss Petition for Rulemaking23.NMED’s Response to Motions to Remand or Dismiss24.Entry of Appearance by Tracy Hughes25.Citizens’ Joint Response to FMI’s Brief on the Commission’s Authority to Conduct Rulemaking and NMED’s Brief on the Commission’s Authority to Consider Petition26.Amigos Bravos’ Motion to Postpone Hearing27.Joint Response to FMI’s Objections to Procedural Order28.NMED’s Notice of Substitution of Counsel29.AG’s Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Reply to FMI’s Consolidated Response30.AG’s Reply to NMED in Support of Motion to Remand31.AG’s Reply to NM Mining Association in Support of Motion to Remand32.NMED’s Reply Brief33.Citizens’ Reply to NMED’s Response to Remand or Dismiss and to NM Mining Association’s Response34.Citizens’ Reply to FMI’s Response to Joint Motion to Dismiss Petition for Rulemaking35.FMI’s Consolidated Reply to the Citizens’ and AG’s Responses to the Brief on Commission Authority36.NMED’s Response to Amigos Bravos’ Motion to Postpone Hearing37.FMI’s Response to Amigos Bravos’ Motion to Postpone Hearing38.Order Granting AG’s Motion to Extend Time for Reply39.AG’s Reply to FMI’s Consolidated Response to Motion to Remand40.Order on AG’s Motion to Admit Record from Tyrone Permit Appeal into Record Proper41.Order on FMI’s Objection to Procedural Order and Request for Clarification42.Administrator’s Service List43.Public notice of Hearing in English and in Spanish44.Order on Amigos Bravos’ Motion to Postpone Hearing45.NMED’s Amended Petition46.Amigos Bravos’ Second Motion to Postpone Hearing47.Order on Amigos Bravos’ Second Motion to Postpone Hearing48.Revised Public Notice of Hearing in English and in Spanish49.NMED Notice of Intent to Present Technical Testimony, with Testimony of Adrian Brown and Thomas Skibitski NMED Exhibits 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 1950.FMI Notice of Intent to Present Technical Testimony, with Testimony of T. Neil Blandford, John Brack, Timothy Eastep, Jim B. Finley, Michael Grass, Lynn Lande, Lewis Munk, James C. Scott, and Thomas L. Shelley FMI Exhibits Blandford 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23. Brack 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. Eastep 1. Finley 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. Grass 1, 2, 3, 4. Lande 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. Lande PowerPoint Munk 1, 2. Scott A, B-1, B-2, C, D, D-1, D-2, D-3, D-4, D-5, D-6, D-7, D-8, D-9, D-10, D-11, D-12, D-13, D-14, D-15, D-16, D-17, D-18, D-19, D-20, D-21, D-22, D-23, D-24, D-25, D-26, D-27, D-28, D-29, D-30, D-31, D-32, D-33, D-34, D-35, D-36, D-37, D-38, D-39, D-40, D-41, D-42, D-43, E. Shelley 1, 2, 3, 4, 5-1, 5-2, 6, 7.51.NMAG Notice of Intent to Present Technical Testimony NMAG Exhibits 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23.52.Amigos Bravos Notice of Intent to Present Technical Testimony, with Testimony of Brian Shields AB Exhibits 1, 2, 3, and 4.53.GRIP and Turner Ranch Properties Notice of Intent to Present Technical Testimony, with Testimony of James Kuipers and Sally Smith Kuipers Exhibits 1 and 2. Smith Exhibits 1, 2, 3 and 4.54.William Olson Notice of Intent to Present Technical Testimony WCO Exhibits 1, 2, 3, 4-6, 7, 8, 9,10, 11,12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.55.FMI Motion for Extension of Time for One Exhibit56.Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time57.FMI Notice of Intent — Supplemental Exhibit – Brack 458.Revised Service List59.NMED’s Notice of Objection to W.C. Olson’s NOI60.NMED’s NOI to Present Technical Rebuttal, with Testimony of Adrian Brown and Thomas Skibitski andExhibit 20, Ex. 21, Ex. 22, Ex. 23, Ex. 24, Ex. 25, Ex. 2661.FMI’s NOI to Present Technical Rebuttal, with Testimony of T. Neil Blandford, Timothy E. Eastep, Jim B. Finley, Jr., Michael Grass, Lynn Lande, Lewis Munk, James C. Scott, and Thomas L. Shelley. Exhibits: Blandford Ex. 1, Ex. 2, Ex. 3, Ex. 4, Ex. 5, Ex. 6, Ex. 7.62.FMI’s Motion for Leave to Withdraw Testimony and Re-file Substitute, Condensed Testimony63.AGO Notice of Filing Rebuttal Testimony and Exhibits withEx. 24, Ex. 25, Ex. 26, Ex. 27, Ex. 28, Ex. 29 and Ex. 30.64.AGO Notice of Errata65.AGO Motion to Strike NMED Notice of Objection66.Amigos Bravos’ NOI to Present Rebuttal Technical Testimony67.GRIP and Turner Ranch Properties NOI to Present Technical Rebuttal Testimony withKuipers Att. A and Att. B68.W.C. Olson NOI to Present Technical Rebuttal Testimony69.Amigos Bravos’ Motion to Strike NMED’s Notice of Objection70.William C. Olson Response to NMED Notice of Objection71.NMED’s Motion to Exclude AGO Exhibits of Written Testimony and Transcripts From Prior Permit Appeal Proceedings72.NMED’s Motion to Exclude Mr. Olson’s Exhibits of Written Testimony and Transcripts from Prior Permit Appeal Proceedings73.AGO Response to FMI’s Motion to Withdraw Testimony and File Substitute Testimony74.AGO Motion to Strike FMI Video – Brack Exhibit 475.NMED’s Response to AGO and Amigos Bravos’ Motions to Strike Notice of Objection76.AGO’s Response to NMED’s Motion to Exclude AGO Exhibits and Testimony from Prior Proceedings77.Olson’s Response to NMED’s Motion to Exclude Olson’s Exhibits and Testimony from Prior Proceedings78.FMI Response to AG Motion to Strike Video Exhibit -Brack 479.FMI Reply on Motion to Withdraw and File Substitute Testimony80.Supplement to AGO Response to FMI Motion to File Substitute Testimony81.Order on Several Motions and Additional Procedural Matters82.NMAGO Notice of Errata83.FMI Notice of Errata84.Notice of Transcript Filing85.AGO Notice of Supplementing Record with AGO Ex. 48 and Ex. 4986.AGO Notice of Filing Complete Set of AGO Exhibits on CD, with CD87.AGO Disc Correcting Errata on Disc Submitted with Item 8688.Joint Motion to Extend Time to File Post-Hearing Submittals89.Order Granting Jont Motion to Extend Time90.Motion to Extend Filing of Post-hearing Briefs91.Order on Motion to Extend Filing of Post-hearing Briefs92.NMED’s Closing Argument93.NMED’s Proposed Statement of Reasons94.FMI’s Closing Argument95.AGO Closing Argument in Support of Joint Proposal96.AGO Statement of Reasons in Support of Joint Proposal97.Amigos Bravos’ Statement of Reasons in Support of its Amendments98.Closing Argument of Gila Resources Information Project, Turner Ranch Properties and Amigos Bravos99.William C. Olson Closing Argument100.William C. Olson Proposed Statement of Reasons101.Joint Proposal from the NMAGO, GRIP, Turner Ranch, Amigos Bravos and William C. Olson102.Notice of Non-Appearance by Tracy Hughes103.AGO Motion to Estop NMED From Taking Inconsistent Positions Before the Commission104.AGO Motion to Strike NMED’s Request that Commission Re-Determine Place of Withdrawal105.AGO Motion to Strike NMED’s Proposed Findings for Lack of Evidence106.FMI’s Consolidated Responses to AGO’s Motions107.NMED’s Consolidated Response to AGO’s Motions108.WQCC Order and Statement of Reasons Adopting the Copper Rule: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3109.Joint Request for Stay of 20.6.7 NMAC by GRIP, TRP and AB110.FMI’s Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Request for Stay and Request for Scheduling Conference and Order111.WCO Concurrence in Motion for Stay of 20.6.7 NMAC112.Procedural Order Relating to the Joint Motion for Stay113.AGO’s Support of Joint Request for Stay of 20.6.7 NMAC114.Notice of Proposed Testimony and Other Evidence Offered in Support of Motion to Stay The Copper Rule Pending Appeal: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5115.NMED’s Response to the Request for Stay116.FMI’s Opposition to the Request for Stay117.Reply to Responses to Stay by TRP, GRIP and AB118.Motion to Disqualify the WQCC from Hearing the Motion for Stay119.Second Procedural Order relating to Motion for Stay120.NMED’s Response to Motion to Disqualify the WQCC from Hearing the Motion to Stay121.FMI’s Response to Motion to Disqualify the WQCC from Hearing the Motion to Stay

Pruebas de la audienciaFMIFCXNOI Excerpts I, Figures from Scott Direct Tx, Ex. J, Ex. K, Ex. L, Blandford Slide Excerpts, Blandford Ex. 8, Ex . 9 y Ex. 10.NMAGEx.31, Ex. 32(parte 1, parte 2, parte 3), Ex. 33(b/n, color), Ex. 34, Ex. 35, Ex. 36, Ex. 37, Ex. 38 (antes Ex. 33a), Ex. 39, Ex. 40, Ex. 41, Ex. 42, Ex. 43, Ex. 44, Ex. 45, Ex. 46, Ex. 47GRIPKuipers Ex JK-1, JK-2, JK-3.Amigos BravosEx.7, Ex . 8WilliamC. OlsonWCOSurrebuttal Ex . 1, Ex. 2, Ex. 3 y Ex. 4.Comentarios del público Las declaraciones escritas y otros documentos presentados durante la audiencia incluyen los comentarios del público de Tammy Arguello, Jens Deichmann, Frank Drysdale, Joe Hempfling, League of Women Voters, Marcy Leavitt, Douglas C. Littlejohn, Sean Ormand, Nick Pedraza con cartas que instan a la devolución, Rio Grande Chapter of the Sierra Club, Allyson Siwik con un documento, Janet Wallet-Ortiz, Max Yeh con una adenda, y una Petición que insta a la devolución de la norma.Los comentarios públicos por escrito enviados al Administrador de la Comisión incluyen cartas recibidas el 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 28, 29 y 30 de abril(parte 1 y parte 2), 1, 2 y 3 de mayo.Los comentarios públicos por escrito enviados al Administrador de la Comisión también incluyen cartas de miembros de Sierra Club fechadas el 26 de abril(parte 1, parte 2, parte 3, parte 4, parte 5, parte 6, parte 7), el 27 de abril (parte 1, parte 2, parte 3, parte 4), el 28 de abril(parte 1, parte 2), el 29 de abril, el 30 de abril, el 1 de mayo, el 2 de mayo y el 3 de mayo.También se presentaron comentarios públicos por escrito durante 2012 como parte del proceso de desarrollo de la norma, y se aceptaron comentarios verbales en Albuquerque y Silver City en septiembre de 2012. Un disco con la grabación de audio está disponible en el Administrador. No se hizo ninguna transcripción.

WQCC La regla del cobre

Asunto WQCC 12-01(R)